About
Kamran Emdadi’s practice focuses
on all aspects of patent prosecution.
Mr. Emdadi’s experience includes substantial software experience, wireless communications devices, semiconductor fabrication, packet switching, telephony, digital communications, artificial intelligence software and LCD displays. He has successfully procured patents in the fields of software, electronic hardware devices and telecommunications.
Prior to law school, Mr. Emdadi was a patent prosecution specialist at a patent firm, a patent agent and worked as an examiner for the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for several years, where he concentrated on multiplex communication devices and wireless communication devices.
Mr. Emdadi is an adjunct professor at George Mason University where he teaches patent strategy and other legal topics for technology professionals.
Mr. Emdadi is a member of the American Intellectual Property Law Association.
Kamran Emdadi
Principal
kamran.emdadi@gmail.com
516 Susan Constant Dr.
Virginia Beach VA 23451
+1.571.437.7660
PRACTICES
Intellectual Property
EDUCATION
University of Baltimore JD
George Mason University, B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E.
ADMISSIONS
District of Columbia
U.S. Patent Office
EXPEREINCE
Engineer – 2 years
USPTO Examiner - 2 years
Patent Preparation
and Prosecution - 18 years
COURTS
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Detailed patent prosecution experience
Mr. Emdadi’s experience with patents has continuously included telecommunications technologies such as: packet switching, broadband digital communications, RF, antenna, optical and cellular.
His Experience at the USPTO include three years of work specifically in art unit classifications: 370 (multiplexing), 375 (TX/RX), 379 (Telephony) and 455 (Cellular). Mr. Emdadi’s name is displayed on the following patents which he examined and ultimately allowed as a patent examiner at the USPTO. His knowledge of what should be included in an allowable telecommunications patent is based on years of experience on both ends of the patent prosecution cycle, both at the USPTO and in private practice.
-
7,006,495 Transmitting multicast data packets
-
6,999,413 Packet switching apparatus
-
6,996,063 Applicable PDU range test and calculation for window-based polling
-
6,977,908 Method and apparatus for discovering computer systems in a distributed multi-system cluster
-
6,788,647 Automatically applying bi-directional quality of service treatment to network data flows
-
6,724,736 Remote echo cancellation in a packet based network
-
6,704,292 Use of remote poll to facilitate determining network topology
-
6,680,931 Data multiplex broadcasting method, data multiplex broadcasting system, receiving device, and recording device
-
6,678,252 Method and apparatus for dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks
-
6,636,490 Self-installation of wireless access network terminals
-
6,631,122 Method and system for wireless QOS agent for all-IP network
-
6,628,660 Finite state machine with associated memory
-
6,603,735 PN sequence identifying device in CDMA communication system
-
6,594,270 Ageing of data packets using queue pointers
-
6,584,069 Packet filtering apparatus that applies a plurality of filtering conditions including different comparison criteria to a single packet
-
6,570,885 Segment-controlled process for controlling castouts from a communication cache in a port in any of multiple nodes in a communications network
-
6,549,532 Allocation of uplink radio resources in a radio communication system
-
6,515,998 Table data retrieving apparatus retrieving table in which reference data is stored by using retrieval key
In private practice, Mr. Emdadi has worked for various patent law firms while representing numerous telecommunications companies including: Hughes, CommScope, Lucent, Siemens, Samsung, Nokia and Broadcom.
He has successfully prosecuted patent applications resulting in allowed patents for each of the above-noted companies, with particular emphasis on Lucent, Nokia and Broadcom. His knowledge of how to write a patent application is based on anticipating the result of the Patent Examiner’s examination approach, while taking into consideration the patent rules and laws which dictate the correct approach to expounding the complex details of a telecommunications patent.